Scalp biomarkers during dupilumab treatment support Th2 pathway pathogenicity in alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms driving alopecia areata (AA) are still unclear, hindering development of targeted therapeutics. Specific Th2 targeting with dupilumab in AA provides a unique opportunity to dissect its pathogenesis and explore the role of Th2 pathway. METHODS: We evaluated changes in scalp biomarkers in AA patients (with and without concomitant atopy) randomized to weekly dupilumab or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by open-label dupilumab for 24 weeks. Changes in biomarker levels were measured at weeks 12, 24, and 48 and were also correlated with clinical hair regrowth. RESULTS: At week 24, preceding clinical hair regrowth outcomes, only dupilumab-treated patients presented significant suppression of cellular infiltrates, and multiple Th2-related, markers (CCL13/MCP-4, CCL18/PARC, CCL26/eotaxin-3, CCL24/Eotaxin-2), coupled with significant upregulation in the hair keratins. Th1-related suppression was evident later (week 48) when all patients received open-label dupilumab. Results were more pronounced in atopic AA patients, that showed 48% and 97% improvements in the lesional AA scalp profile at weeks 24 and 48, respectively, while 2% worsening was seen in the placebo arm at week 24. Moreover, placebo-treated patients presented 54% worsening in hair keratins when compared with baseline at week 24. At week 24, increases in hair keratins showed significant correlations only with decreases in Th2-related markers. CONCLUSIONS: Scalp biomarkers provide evidence of dupilumab efficacy in AA, detected even prior to clinical response, with exclusive correlations between early suppression of Th2 markers and increased hair keratins. These findings strengthen previous reports suggesting a possible role for Th2 cytokines as AA drivers.

Oral contraceptives cause evolutionarily novel increases in hormone exposure: A risk factor for breast cancer.

Background and objectives: In the evolutionary past, women spent most of their reproductive lives either pregnant or in lactational amenorrhea, and rarely menstruated. The current pattern of frequent menses, and the associated increase in endogenous hormonal exposure, has been implicated in the current breast cancer epidemic. It is not known, however, whether oral contraceptives further increase, or actually decrease, hormonal exposure over one menstrual cycle. Here, we examined variation in hormonal exposure across seven oral contraceptive (OC) formulations, and produced the first quantitative comparison of exogenous versus endogenous hormone exposure. Methodology: Data from 12 studies of serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) were aggregated to create a composite graph of endogenous hormone levels over one menstrual cycle in European or American women (age 19-40 years). Pharmacokinetic package insert data, also from Western women, were used to calculate exposures for hormones in seven different OC formulations. Endogenous and exogenous hormone levels were compared after adjusting for the relative binding affinity (RBA) of progestin to the progesterone receptor and ethinyl estradiol (EE) to the estrogen receptor. Results: After adjusting for RBA, median ethinyl estradiol exposure across 28 days in the OCs was 11.4 nmol/l, similar to median E2 exposure. One formulation, however, was 40% higher in ethinyl estradiol exposure relative to median endogenous estradiol. Median exposure from progestins in OCs (1496 nmol/l) was 4-fold higher than the median endogenous exposure from P4 (364 nmol/l). Exposure from OC progestins ranged from one sixtieth to 8-fold median endogenous P4 over 28 days. Conclusions and implications: Given that breast cancer risk increases with hormonal exposure, our finding that four widely prescribed formulations more than quadruple progestin exposure relative to endogenous progesterone exposure is cause for concern. As not all formulations produce the same exposures, these findings are pertinent to contraceptive choice. We also identify critical gaps in the provision of relevant data on pharmacokinetics and carcinogenicity by drug manufacturers.